By composer and critic Felix Borowski
It is at once a fascinating and a difficult investigation which has for its raison d'etre the discovery of musical discoverers. Such an investigation must be fascinating because there is a certain piquant satisfaction in tracing the origin of things to the source from which they have spring; it is difficult because in so many cases - nearly in all - the existance of numberless affairs of art has been the result of evolutionary processes rather than the offshoot of a sudden and an unexpected stronke of inventive inspriation on the part of some gifted men (or women). The difficulty is added to in certain cases by the nebulous condition of musical chronicles in earlier periods of time.
Inventions which were of material assistance to the progress of what may be called modern music could not come into being until someon discovered a method of expressing musical ideas in writing - the invention of musical notation, in a word. This invention had, first of all, to consist of a staff which would permit the pitch of sounds to be designated, and secondly of a method of indicationg the duration of notes. Now a primitive species of notation had been employed by the ancient Greeks and Romans, and in the eighth century a species of stenographic notation - it is known to us as the "Neume" system - was in general use. But there was not staff and therefore no precise method of fixing the pitch of notes.
The Invention of The Staff
The first great invention arrived, therefore, with the discovery of the staff. This came about with the employment of one line, the pitch of whihc was supposed to represent the note "F;" but no one knows who was the musician to whom it first occurred to fix the exact pitch of the "Neumes" placed upon this line. Probably it was some humble but ingenious monk - for after all, it was the monasteries that, in the earlier days of art, accomplished the most for music and painting and sculpture.
The staff was then, however, in a merely rudimentary state. We arrive at the invention of one such as is known to us today; and this brings forward the name of Guido of Arezzo. This Benedictine monk, who was born about 995 at Arezzo, in Tuscany, was undoubtedly the inventor of the four line staff; whether he was also the inventor of some other things - solmization and the clefs for instance - is less certain. The discovery of giving time and rhythm to music came later; nor is it possible to say who was the first to invent notes of different value, or who invented the signs which we call "rest." Bar line did nto come into existence until about four hundred years ago.
The First Printed Music
The gratitude of music lovers should go out to the man who first made printed music possible. Now the art of printing music followed very shortly the invention of printing books. The first to print music of any kind from type was Ulrich Hahn, a Roman printer who brought out a Roman missal with notes in 1476. His work was quickly taken up by other printers. Our modern system of printing sheet music froum engraved copper plates was invented by Simone Verivio, of Rome, who published by this method his collection of Canzonettes entitled Diletto Spirituale in 1586. But music typography has, to be sure, undergone remarkable changes and improvements since that time.
By the time the sixteenth century had well started, the rapid dissemination of printed music led to the not less rapid development of different forms in the art itself.
But the century had grown old before any important inventions bearing upon modern music came into existence. It was the rise of instrumental art which was responsible for many of the inventions which, primitive enough four hundred years ago, have since grown into wonderful and complicated forms of art; but in the sixteenth century instrumental music as a separate and independent branch was in its infancy, and it was the handmaid of vocal art. Yet neither the opera nor the oratorio could here come into existence without it.
Monday, March 23, 2020
Saturday, January 4, 2020
Selected Technical Truths from World Famous Pianists
Gems of Pedagogical Thought Crystallized in the Crucible of Time and Experience
Don't Imitate
Don't imitate anyone. Keep true to yourself. Cultivate your individuality in all your practicing and do not follow blindly in the paths others - Franz Liszt
Fast Playing
Do not play too fast. You must bring out the harmonic and melodic beauties, and you cannot do that if you treat the piano like a sewing machine. - Hans Van Bulow
Avoid Fatigue
Physical weakness from too much practice is just as bad as mental fatigue. To permit the muscles to get over-tired is to spoil the tone, at least for the time being and some time must elapse before they can regain their former elasticity and vigor. - I. J. Paderewski
Thought In Playing
Fine playing requires much deep thought away from the keyboard. The student should not feel that when the notes have been played his task is done. It is in fact only begun. He must make the piece a part of himself. Every note must awaken in him a kind of musical consciousness of his artistic mission. - S. V. Rachmaninoff
Phrasing and Fingering
Phrasing is closely allied to the subject of accentuation and both subjects are intimately connected with thatof fingering. Without the use of the proper fingers it is often impossible to execute certain phrases correctly. - F. B. Busoni
Polished Playing
Each note is a composition should be polished until it is as perfect as a jewel - as perfect as an Indian diamond - those wonderful, scintillating, ever-changing orbs of light. In a really great masterpiece each note has its place just as the stars, the jewels of heaven, have their places in their constellations. - Vladimir De Pachmann
Saving Time
The technique which saves time is the technique of the brain, which directs the fingers to the right place at the right time. This may be made the greatest source of musical economy. If you want to save time in your music study, see that you comprehend your musical problems thoroughly. - Xaver Scharwenka
Be Punctual
Be punctual in all your practice. Everything with me goes by clockwork. My house is like a dove-cote. - Frederic Chopin
Intelligent Practice
Don't simply run over the keys as a parrot runs over its pet phrases. That is not real practice. Goodness knows - the parrot has practice enough but it can talk to the day of doom without increasing its mental capacity. All practice must be intelligent - progressive, self-developing. - Emil Sauer
Years and Tears
It is only with labor of years and tears bitter as death that the true artist is developed. Few realize this. Consequently there are few artists. - Anton Rubinstein
An Ounce of Prevention
Remember that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. Avoid sowing the seeds of mere mechanical playing which devoid as they are of musical feeling, can only beget their own kind. - Dr. William Mason
Real Practice
Continually playing a piece over and over is not what I call practice. When I want to learn a new piece I do not keep the notes in front of me on the music rack. I throw them on the top of the piano so that I have to get up every time I want to look at them. After the image of the passage to be memorized is well i mind I sit down at the instrument and try to reproduce it - notes, touch, pedaling and all. Learn as passage just once. Afterwards only repeat it.
- Theodore Leschetizky
To those who are still in the preparatory stage of development I am glad to give one word of advice. Do not play pieces that are away beyond your grasp. Pupils who do this are committing the greatest fault in our American musical educational life. - Fannie Bloomfield Zeisler
True Interpretation
Really artistic piano playing is an impossibility unless the outlines of technique have been erased to make way for true interpretation in the highest sense of the word. - Josef Hofmann
Listen!
It is absolutely necessary to listen to every note you play. Music is a sound, and must be studied accordingly. - William Sherwood
____________________
Originally presented in The Etude, October 1912
Monday, July 30, 2018
London - After the Romans (part two)
By Walter Besant
The following are the facts related by the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle:
A.D. 443 - This year Britons sent over sea to Rome, and begged for help against the Piets; but they had none, because they were themselves warring against Atilla, King of the Huns. And then they sent to the Angles, and entreated the like of the Ethelings of Angles.
A.D. 449 - Hengist and Hora, invited by Verigern, King of the Britons, landed in Britain on the shore called Wippidsfleet, at first in aid of the Britons, but afterward they fought against them. King Vortigern gave them land in the southeast of this country on condition that they should fight against the Piets. Then they fought against the Piets, and had the victory wheresoever they came. Then they sent to the Angles, desired a larger force tob e sent, and caused them to be told the worthlessness of the Britons and the excellence of the land. Then they soon sent thither a larger force in aid of the others. At that time came men from three tribes in Germany - from the Old Saxons, from the Angles, and from the Jutes. From the Jutes came the Kentish men and the Wightwarians, that is, the trib which now dwells in Wight, and that race among the West Saxons which is still called the reace of Jutes. From the Old Saxons came the men of Essex and Sussex and Wessex. From Anglia, which has ever since remained waste, betwixt the Jutes and Saxons, came the mend of East Anglia, Middle Anglia, Merica and all Northumbria.
A.D. 455 - THis year Hengist and Horsa fought against King Voritgern at the place called Aegelsthrep (Aylesford) and his brother Horsa was slain, and after that Hengist obtained the kingdom and Aese , his son.
A.D. 456 - This year Hengist and Aese slew four troops of Britons with the edge of the swaord in the place which is named Creeganford (Crayford).
A.D. 457 - This year Hengist and Aese his son fought against the Britons at a place called Creegan ford, and there slew 4000 men. And the Britons then forsook Kent, and in great terror fled London.
A.D. 465 - This year Hengist and Aese fought against the Welsh near Wippidsfleet, and there slew twelve Welsh ealdermen, and one fo their own thanes was slain there, whose name was Wippid.
A.D. 473 - This year Hengist and Aese fought against the Welsh, and took spoils innumerable; and the Welsh fled from the Angles like fire.
A.D. 477 - This eyar Aella and his three sons, Cymen and Wlemcing and Cissa, came to the land of Britain with their ships at a place called Cymenes-ora, and there slew many Welsh, and some they drove in flight into the wood that is named Andreds-lea. (Probably the landing was on the coast of Sussex.)
A.D. 485 - This year Aella fought against the Welsh near the bandk of Meareraedsburn.
A.D. 491 - This year Aella and Cissa besieged Andredscester (Pevensey), and slew all the dwelt therein, so that not a single Briton was left.
A.D. 495 - This year two ealdermen came to Britain, Cerdic and Cynric, his son, with five ships, at the place which is called Cerdicsore (probably Calshot Castle, on Southampton Water), and Stuf and Whitgar fought against the Britons and put them to flight.
A.D. 519 - This year Cerdic and Cynric obtained the kingdom of the West Saxons; and te smae year they fought against the Britons where it is now name Cerdies-ford (Charford on the Avon, near Fordingbridge), and from that time forth the royal offspring of the West Saxons.
A.D. 527 - This year Cerdic and Cynric fought against the Britons at the place called Cerdics-lea.
A.D. 530 - This year Cerdic Cynric conquered the Island of Wight, and slew many men at Whit-garas-byrg (Carisbrook, Isle of Wight).
A.D. 547 - This year Ida began to reign, from whom came the royal race of Northumberland.
The conquest of England was now vertually completed.
In the next installment we shall examine why there is no mention whatsoever of the capture of London in the Chronicle.
The following are the facts related by the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle:
A.D. 443 - This year Britons sent over sea to Rome, and begged for help against the Piets; but they had none, because they were themselves warring against Atilla, King of the Huns. And then they sent to the Angles, and entreated the like of the Ethelings of Angles.
A.D. 449 - Hengist and Hora, invited by Verigern, King of the Britons, landed in Britain on the shore called Wippidsfleet, at first in aid of the Britons, but afterward they fought against them. King Vortigern gave them land in the southeast of this country on condition that they should fight against the Piets. Then they fought against the Piets, and had the victory wheresoever they came. Then they sent to the Angles, desired a larger force tob e sent, and caused them to be told the worthlessness of the Britons and the excellence of the land. Then they soon sent thither a larger force in aid of the others. At that time came men from three tribes in Germany - from the Old Saxons, from the Angles, and from the Jutes. From the Jutes came the Kentish men and the Wightwarians, that is, the trib which now dwells in Wight, and that race among the West Saxons which is still called the reace of Jutes. From the Old Saxons came the men of Essex and Sussex and Wessex. From Anglia, which has ever since remained waste, betwixt the Jutes and Saxons, came the mend of East Anglia, Middle Anglia, Merica and all Northumbria.
A.D. 455 - THis year Hengist and Horsa fought against King Voritgern at the place called Aegelsthrep (Aylesford) and his brother Horsa was slain, and after that Hengist obtained the kingdom and Aese , his son.
A.D. 456 - This year Hengist and Aese slew four troops of Britons with the edge of the swaord in the place which is named Creeganford (Crayford).
A.D. 457 - This year Hengist and Aese his son fought against the Britons at a place called Creegan ford, and there slew 4000 men. And the Britons then forsook Kent, and in great terror fled London.
A.D. 465 - This year Hengist and Aese fought against the Welsh near Wippidsfleet, and there slew twelve Welsh ealdermen, and one fo their own thanes was slain there, whose name was Wippid.
A.D. 473 - This year Hengist and Aese fought against the Welsh, and took spoils innumerable; and the Welsh fled from the Angles like fire.
A.D. 477 - This eyar Aella and his three sons, Cymen and Wlemcing and Cissa, came to the land of Britain with their ships at a place called Cymenes-ora, and there slew many Welsh, and some they drove in flight into the wood that is named Andreds-lea. (Probably the landing was on the coast of Sussex.)
A.D. 485 - This year Aella fought against the Welsh near the bandk of Meareraedsburn.
A.D. 491 - This year Aella and Cissa besieged Andredscester (Pevensey), and slew all the dwelt therein, so that not a single Briton was left.
A.D. 495 - This year two ealdermen came to Britain, Cerdic and Cynric, his son, with five ships, at the place which is called Cerdicsore (probably Calshot Castle, on Southampton Water), and Stuf and Whitgar fought against the Britons and put them to flight.
A.D. 519 - This year Cerdic and Cynric obtained the kingdom of the West Saxons; and te smae year they fought against the Britons where it is now name Cerdies-ford (Charford on the Avon, near Fordingbridge), and from that time forth the royal offspring of the West Saxons.
A.D. 527 - This year Cerdic and Cynric fought against the Britons at the place called Cerdics-lea.
A.D. 530 - This year Cerdic Cynric conquered the Island of Wight, and slew many men at Whit-garas-byrg (Carisbrook, Isle of Wight).
A.D. 547 - This year Ida began to reign, from whom came the royal race of Northumberland.
The conquest of England was now vertually completed.
In the next installment we shall examine why there is no mention whatsoever of the capture of London in the Chronicle.
Friday, April 20, 2018
London - After the Romans (part one)
By Walter Besant
The only authorities for the events which took place in Britain during the fifth and sixth centuries are Gildas and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. There are other writers - Etherwerd, for instance, who copied the Chronicle, and adds nothing; Nennius, whose work, edited by on Mark the Hermit, in the tenth century, was found in the Vatican. The first edition was published in London in the year 1819, in the original Latin, by Rev. William Gunn. Nennius gives a brief account of King Arthur and his exploits, but he affords little or no information that is of use to us. The work of Richard of Cirencester is extremely valuable on acccount of its topography; it is also interesting as the work of the first English antiquary. But he belonged to the fourteenth century, and has added nothing to the history, of which he knew no more that we ourselves can discover. The book named after Geoffrey of Monmouth is not worth a moment's serious consideration. In Bede's Ecclesiastical History passages may be found which throw side lights onto this period but they are few.
St. Gildas, called Badonicus, is supposed to have been born about the year 520, in Wales. He wrote about the year 560 and is therefore contemporary with the events of which he speaks. His book contains a vast quantity of rhetoric to a very small amount of history. Unfortunately for him, he was called by his admiring fellow-monks in his lifetime, Sapiens - the Sage or Sapient. Perhaps in order to live up to this designation, he was fain to regard himself with so much respect as to assume the garb and language of a prophet, and with what he thought prophectic force, which we now perceive to be ecclesiastical inflation and exaggeration, he proceeded to admonish princes and people of their sins. Every age, to the ecclesiastical prophet, as to the secular satirist, is an age of unbounded profligacy; of vice such as the world has never before witnessed; of luxury advanced to heights hitherto untrodden; of license, wantonness, riot unbridled and unparalleled, insomuchas that Jerusalem, even under the soft influences of Ahola and Aholibah, was righteous and pure in comparison.
No doubt Gildas lived in a most trying and disappointing time. Things went wrong and things went from bad to worse. His own people were defeated and driven continually westward; they couldn not even hold together and fight side by side against the common enemy; religion was forgotten in the fierce struggles for life, and in the fiercer civil dissensions; Saxon, Angle, or Jute, all were alike in that none had any reverence for priest or for Church; the worst passions were aroused. Yet one cannont but think that a lower note might have been struck with greater advantage; and now that it is impossible to learn how far the prophet's admonitions brought repentance to the kings, one regrets that a simple statement of the events in chronological order as they ocurred was not thought necessary to complete a historical work.
As regards the alleged luxury of the time, the monk wrote from a dismal cell, very likely wattled, draughty and cold; his food was poor and scanty; his bed was hard; life to him was mere endurance. The roasted meats (and vegetables), the soft pillows and cushions, the heated rooms of the better sort, seemed wicked luxury, especially when he thought of the conquering Saxon and his ruined country. Of course in every age the wealthy will surround themselves with whatever comforts can be procured. We are in these days, for instance, advanced to an inconceivable height of luxury. One would like to invite the luxurious Cuneglass to spend a day or two with a young man of the present day. Those who were neither rich nor free lived hardly, as they do to this day; those who were young and strong, even though they were not perhaps trained to the use of arms, easily learned how to use them, and when it came to victory or death, they soon recovered the old British spirit.
This is not the place, otherwise it would be intersting to show what a long and gallant stand was made by these people, whom it is customary to call cowardly and luxurious - these ancestors of the gallant Welsh. It is manifest that a period of two hundred yeaers and more of peace almost profound, their frontiers and their coasts guarded for them by the legions of Rome, must have lowered the British spirit. But they quickly recovered. The Arthurian epic, it s certain, has some foundation in fact, and perhaps poor King Cuneglass himself, the bear and butcher, wielded a valiant sword.
In our next installemnt - the facts related by the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.
By Walter Besant
The only authorities for the events which took place in Britain during the fifth and sixth centuries are Gildas and the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle. There are other writers - Etherwerd, for instance, who copied the Chronicle, and adds nothing; Nennius, whose work, edited by on Mark the Hermit, in the tenth century, was found in the Vatican. The first edition was published in London in the year 1819, in the original Latin, by Rev. William Gunn. Nennius gives a brief account of King Arthur and his exploits, but he affords little or no information that is of use to us. The work of Richard of Cirencester is extremely valuable on acccount of its topography; it is also interesting as the work of the first English antiquary. But he belonged to the fourteenth century, and has added nothing to the history, of which he knew no more that we ourselves can discover. The book named after Geoffrey of Monmouth is not worth a moment's serious consideration. In Bede's Ecclesiastical History passages may be found which throw side lights onto this period but they are few.
St. Gildas, called Badonicus, is supposed to have been born about the year 520, in Wales. He wrote about the year 560 and is therefore contemporary with the events of which he speaks. His book contains a vast quantity of rhetoric to a very small amount of history. Unfortunately for him, he was called by his admiring fellow-monks in his lifetime, Sapiens - the Sage or Sapient. Perhaps in order to live up to this designation, he was fain to regard himself with so much respect as to assume the garb and language of a prophet, and with what he thought prophectic force, which we now perceive to be ecclesiastical inflation and exaggeration, he proceeded to admonish princes and people of their sins. Every age, to the ecclesiastical prophet, as to the secular satirist, is an age of unbounded profligacy; of vice such as the world has never before witnessed; of luxury advanced to heights hitherto untrodden; of license, wantonness, riot unbridled and unparalleled, insomuchas that Jerusalem, even under the soft influences of Ahola and Aholibah, was righteous and pure in comparison.
No doubt Gildas lived in a most trying and disappointing time. Things went wrong and things went from bad to worse. His own people were defeated and driven continually westward; they couldn not even hold together and fight side by side against the common enemy; religion was forgotten in the fierce struggles for life, and in the fiercer civil dissensions; Saxon, Angle, or Jute, all were alike in that none had any reverence for priest or for Church; the worst passions were aroused. Yet one cannont but think that a lower note might have been struck with greater advantage; and now that it is impossible to learn how far the prophet's admonitions brought repentance to the kings, one regrets that a simple statement of the events in chronological order as they ocurred was not thought necessary to complete a historical work.
As regards the alleged luxury of the time, the monk wrote from a dismal cell, very likely wattled, draughty and cold; his food was poor and scanty; his bed was hard; life to him was mere endurance. The roasted meats (and vegetables), the soft pillows and cushions, the heated rooms of the better sort, seemed wicked luxury, especially when he thought of the conquering Saxon and his ruined country. Of course in every age the wealthy will surround themselves with whatever comforts can be procured. We are in these days, for instance, advanced to an inconceivable height of luxury. One would like to invite the luxurious Cuneglass to spend a day or two with a young man of the present day. Those who were neither rich nor free lived hardly, as they do to this day; those who were young and strong, even though they were not perhaps trained to the use of arms, easily learned how to use them, and when it came to victory or death, they soon recovered the old British spirit.
This is not the place, otherwise it would be intersting to show what a long and gallant stand was made by these people, whom it is customary to call cowardly and luxurious - these ancestors of the gallant Welsh. It is manifest that a period of two hundred yeaers and more of peace almost profound, their frontiers and their coasts guarded for them by the legions of Rome, must have lowered the British spirit. But they quickly recovered. The Arthurian epic, it s certain, has some foundation in fact, and perhaps poor King Cuneglass himself, the bear and butcher, wielded a valiant sword.
In our next installemnt - the facts related by the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle.
Saturday, January 20, 2018
The Awakening
An editorial by
James Frances Cooke
Prudery an Injury
Nothing could be
more disastrous to American music and American drama than an ear of prudery.
The kill-joy earnestness of the zealots continually seeking a Cromwell, to
exchange bloody rebellion for some other form of mental and bodily activity,
rarely lead to permanent forms of art. Every instance of narrow Puritanism,
however necessary it may have been at the time, has been suffocating to higher
artistic development. Contrast the products of our own picturesque William
Billings, with those of his European contemporaries, Haydn and Mozart.
The enemies of
prudery do not plead for licentiousness. They seek to secure decency coupled
with common sense. They do not seek to evade the broad human problems that
discipline the mind and fortify the soul. They do not strive to escape the
vital sociological questions which since the time of Euripides and Aristophanes
have been answered in the theater with the greatest possible force. The canyon between
Ibsen's Ghosts, Pinero's Second Mrs. Tanqueray, Hauptmnann's Hanele, Henry
Arthur Jones' Mrs. Dane's Defence, or even Brieux's unnecessarily clinical Les
Avaries, and some of the hopelessly degrading musical shows of the last five or
ten years is as wide and as deep as the Colorado.
How the
Objectionable Song Is Popularized
How does the
infamous song come into existence? Harry B. Smith, author of the libretto of
Robin Hood, and dozens of other pieces, has given us a hint. The composer and
the librettist hand in their completed work to the manager. The rehearsals
commence and the stage door is besieged by representatives of microscopic
publishers, all fighting like vandals to get a hearing for their songs.
Sometimes the songs have real merit, sometimes they are absolutely worthless
products of the cheapest kind of untrained intellect. Sometimes they are filled
with the venomous virus of the social ulcers of the megalopolis. Never does the
song have any direct bearing upon the subject of the libretto, or bear any
relations to the composer's musical scheme. The manager is either moved by the
personal persuasion of the publisher, the whim of one of his singer, a bribe or
his own belief that the song may "carry" the piece. In the last point
he has good precedent because some pieces have been "carried" by
particularly taking songs. Even Robin Hood owed a lot to Oh, Promise Me.
False Success
The song gets on.
The galley is packed with whistlers, claquers, etc., etc., all of them Hessian
hirelings of the song publisher. The song is greeted with a kind of uproar from
the gallery. It is demanded again and again. The people in the lower part of
the house have little idea that they are being buncoed into taking part in
making a worthless song a valuable property for some trifling publisher - soon
lend themselves to the psychological influence of the mob and find themselves
applauding sentiments they would be ashamed to think about in their own homes.
The songs has a run - some publishers report that the run rarely survives six
months. If the song is merely illiterate, meaningless, bathos or sickly
sentiment it can do but little harm, but when it is reeking with the offensive
allusions found in some of the songs of the day, it is time that a musical
Board of Health be appointed to disinfect the whole nauseous matter. We do not
believe that the people of this country want songs of the pestilential kind. We
believe that the so-called hits of this order are entirely artificial. We are
confident that the offensive musical numbers do not exist because of the
genuine demand, but because they are pounded into the people with theatrical
sledge hammers by the panderers that the respectable publishers of New York and
every other city are all anxious to annihilate.
How You May Help
Reaching the eyes
of many people, Manor Selby Journal may become a great force in safe-guarding
the spirit of decency. Its readers may take an active part in exterminating the
bad influence of the questionable song. How is it to be done? Certainly it
cannot be accomplished by muck-raking. Denouncing special songs advertises
them. Their publishers count such notoriety. In England audiences have a custom
of booing and hooting anything which does not meet popular approval. In this
country we resort to the deadly silence. Theatrical performers virtually live
upon applause. Let self-respecting people lose no opportunity to show their
attitude toward music and plays surrounding suggestive ideas and the managers
will soon have their ears to the ground.
- edited by Boulevard Denim
- edited by Boulevard Denim
Saturday, June 17, 2017
Reviews for Conversations with George Edgar Selby
The soundtrack album to Beside the Manor Selby, Conversations with George Edgar Selby has new reviews by noted musicophiles Russell Hammond, of New South Wales, Australia as well as Sven B. Schreiber. We present them here along with an earlier review by critic at large Boulevard Denim.
The remastered album is available here from Melodic Revolution Records.
The album also features composer Ellsworth Hall's Piano Concerto No. 1 in addition to the soundtrack material.
Conversations with George Edgar Selby (music CD - includes music from the soundtrack to Beside the Manor Selby)
Review by Sven B. Schreiber (sbs)
The remastered album is available here from Melodic Revolution Records.
The album also features composer Ellsworth Hall's Piano Concerto No. 1 in addition to the soundtrack material.
Conversations with George Edgar Selby (music CD - includes music from the soundtrack to Beside the Manor Selby)
Review by Sven B. Schreiber (sbs)
Ellsworth Hall - to me, a very important name in the prog genre. In 2017, he released a 15-minute song, which I regard as one of the best epic tracks in prog history ("A Home In Your Thoughts / Second Home In Your Thoughts"). I'm extemely picky with tracks above 8 minutes running time, so this kind of appreciation really occurs rarely. The piano concerto on this album is another exquisite epic work, much better than similar attempts done by others. The soundtrack completes the great impression. Favorite track: Allegro Moderato.
On the Composer's Oeuvre -
Review by Boulevard Denim
Ellsworth Hall occupies a peculiar place, entirely of his own creation, in the field of contemporary music. He is a seeker after the realities of shadowy and dim illusions, an artist in grays and greens and subtle golds while still dabbling in opulent purples. Mr. Hall is of the "children of revelry," a weaver of dreams. For him, indeed, shadows and dreams are the invincible realities, and from them he derives a compelling music; music which serenely rebukes dissection.
That serenity, that innocence of intention, are indeed remarkable. After the plangent splendors, the torrential rhetoric of his earlier works, Mr. Hall's contemporary oeuvre, owing something of the subdued and elusive beauty of antique tapestries, addresses the spirit with a unique appeal.
His is music in which the emotion conveyed is the emotion of remembered rapture, the beauty, "the surviving beauty of gathered dreams;" seldom the emotion and beauty of that which is actual and present. Mr. Hall is most urgently aroused by such moods of longing and remote enchantment as find jeweled expression in Beside the Manor Selby for which he has written unforgettable music.
At times his habit of artistic speech tempt him to such outbursts of passionate lament as fill the movements of his Piano Concerto No.1 with so insupportable a poignancy. There is the driving rhythmic asymmetry of the opening movement; the decorative flourishes surrounding the resurfacing primary theme in the second; the modal and jazzy harmonies of the third; and the adroit use of fortspinnung (along with recapitulations of a leitmotif from the second movement) in the fourth.
Mr. Hall perceives his world with as rapt a gaze, with as complete an absorption in its emotional panorama, as the most vivid and declamatory of the moderns; but the issue of his understanding is certain veiled and continent intensity, an interior passion, a conviction implied rather than than declared. That is, finally, the peculiarity of his art.
Track by track review by Russell Hammond (with gracious permission)
There is light and darkness together with tension and release within the same track
Review by Boulevard Denim
Ellsworth Hall occupies a peculiar place, entirely of his own creation, in the field of contemporary music. He is a seeker after the realities of shadowy and dim illusions, an artist in grays and greens and subtle golds while still dabbling in opulent purples. Mr. Hall is of the "children of revelry," a weaver of dreams. For him, indeed, shadows and dreams are the invincible realities, and from them he derives a compelling music; music which serenely rebukes dissection.
That serenity, that innocence of intention, are indeed remarkable. After the plangent splendors, the torrential rhetoric of his earlier works, Mr. Hall's contemporary oeuvre, owing something of the subdued and elusive beauty of antique tapestries, addresses the spirit with a unique appeal.
His is music in which the emotion conveyed is the emotion of remembered rapture, the beauty, "the surviving beauty of gathered dreams;" seldom the emotion and beauty of that which is actual and present. Mr. Hall is most urgently aroused by such moods of longing and remote enchantment as find jeweled expression in Beside the Manor Selby for which he has written unforgettable music.
At times his habit of artistic speech tempt him to such outbursts of passionate lament as fill the movements of his Piano Concerto No.1 with so insupportable a poignancy. There is the driving rhythmic asymmetry of the opening movement; the decorative flourishes surrounding the resurfacing primary theme in the second; the modal and jazzy harmonies of the third; and the adroit use of fortspinnung (along with recapitulations of a leitmotif from the second movement) in the fourth.
Mr. Hall perceives his world with as rapt a gaze, with as complete an absorption in its emotional panorama, as the most vivid and declamatory of the moderns; but the issue of his understanding is certain veiled and continent intensity, an interior passion, a conviction implied rather than than declared. That is, finally, the peculiarity of his art.
Track by track review by Russell Hammond (with gracious permission)
There is light and darkness together with tension and release within the same track
and if not, then with the next track. I have not seen
‘Besides the
Manor Selby’ and I can only comment on the music:
Lento e Allegro – my favourite instrumental track from the
album and a
worthy opener. I love its length, the way it ebbs and flows,
the
different instrumentation, the drive behind the track and
how you
simply stopped it. Not a wasted note and it didn’t overstay
its
welcome.
Andante e Presto – This one seems to have the kitchen sink
thrown in
it. Quiet start and then deviates all over the place
following little
themes here and there and some interesting percussion thrown
in. You
definitely won’t be dancing to this track.
Allegro Moderato – Just great to sit down and let the track
wash over
you. I liked the stripped back nature with enough ‘Selby’
thrown in.
Andante – the beginning didn’t win me over at all with the
synth out
front. But then that was just the warm up and with different
instruments and with then the strings to round the track.
Love the
piano section in the middle (a breather) and then it builds
on itself
a number of times to its climax and final release – I love
the
clapping at the end too.
Besides the Manor Selby Overture – This was the only track
to touch me
and I wiped my eyes. To me it was thought provoking and made
me
reflect on my life today.
Newsreel – this track that didn’t agree with me but it might
be down to context.
(Editor's note: For context - the track is played along with a newsreel depicting a battle in Verdun during WWI)
After Ferdinand – Another track that starts off with drive
but doesn’t
resolve itself for me – that context again. Way too short.
(Editor's note: For context - the track is part of the opening credits)
Round About the Garden – I can imagine what this track is
trying to convey.
The Archduke Earsworth – Love a good waltz. Pleasant.
The Tower – This track took me on a not too long enjoyable
journey.
Gather the Heirlooms – rather down beat track but nicely
layered with
a real presence.
La Masque a Enleve – A hymn? My French is non existent but
the track
gathers a real church atmosphere with that deep organ.
Verdun – Lovely piano and atmospheric (eerie?) vocals.
Reminded me a
bit of a Rick Wakeman track in Journey to the Centre of the
Earth.
Undone in Verden – Hard to believe this follows the last
track. Mostly
pastoral with that orchestral part in the middle. It could
have wound
away for a few more minutes for me.
Here Lies a Wretched Corpse – If the name of a track can
determine the
soundscape of a track then this is it. A bit of ‘Selby’
reprised and
it is very well layered and I could see this being at the
end of the
movie or as the end credits are rolling.
In Grief Unbound – simply stunning and could have been
released as a
single. Your standards for the choice of vocalist are very
high – to
my ancient ears. (Editor's note - the vocalist here is the remarkable Dyan Brown)Friday, June 12, 2015
Why The Masters Died Poor
By Chas. Doran
It has been said that the great composers, with few exceptions, have left the world no other inheritance than their compositions, and yet many of them received princely sums for their latter works and fabulous gifts from crown heads, to say nothing of the generous provisions made for them from the the treasuries of the states in which they lived. Yet they died poor.
Perhaps Chopin's words to a lady admirer, in reply to her question as to whether he was wealthy: "My only wealth is in the richness of my musical notes," may shed some light upon the subject, if we interpret the remark to mean that most of the noted composers cared not for any other kind of riches than that in which they could endow their works. We know that Verdi gave away much of his earnings to the poor of his native city, and that Schubert was so good to others that he was frequently reminded of his too great consideration of the needs of the poor by his bankers returning to him his order upon the bank with the words "No funds to your credit" written across the face of the paper. Schubert's generosity was proverbial and once caused him to write to a friend: "I suppose you are right, my charity to others has made a mendicant of myself."
One of Mozart's highest aims in life was to live to see the day when he had dipensed in philanthropic works a hundred thousand florins, and we are told by one of his biographers that before the great maestro closed his eyes in death he had given away three times this sum to the poor of the country of this birth. Beethoven loved money, and was very exacting with his publishers in the payment of royalties due him, holding them to account for the last penny, and his earnings must, too, have been very great, for like Verdi he was the idol of the hour, yet he left to his heirs but little money.
He wrote to one of his pupils who asked him for some advice: "Love money, but only for the good you can do with it, and save every mark you can until you have accumulated enought money with which to do some substantial good." Mendelssohn dreamed of the good he could do with the money he received from the royalties upon his compositions, and it is said carried out many of his dreams. He, like other great composers, left to the world little inheritance besides his marvelous musical creations.
Donizetti died poor, yet he could have gone to his grave a weathly man for his time. Liszt gave away money, but never without seeing first wherein it would accomplish the greatest good, and when he was on his deathbed he turned to his spiritual comforter and said: "I have given away my silver and leave to the world as an inheritance but the works that have brought me the silver."
Gounod classed composers among dreamers. "They live in an atmosphere laden with music, to them the world is either a waltz or a dirge, gladness or sorrow," and Gottschalk wrote of his own life: "A dream, the air about which has been music, today the softness and sweetness of a nocturne, tomorrow possibly the power and majesty of a requiem." And the composer of the "Last Hope" was no exception to the rule, he died a poor man, leaving to the world much wealth, but like other great composers a wealth of sublime music. He is said to have earned a fortune and yet he left not enough money with which to raise a fitting monument over his grave. Great musicians, like poets, have nearly all been very visionary; "they have lived in the world and yet been no part of its material advancement," as Von Bulow put it, when writing of the lives of two of his fellow composers.
The world has been a beautiful dream in which they have produced the music with which to enchant the forms that have appeared in it. Money, worldly possessions have been but as the means to sustain the body while the mind dreamed and the fingers penned the sublime notes that inspirations brought forth from the heart.
Fame seems to have had no other meaning to the most of the world's greatest composers than as the wherewith, so to speak, with which they were to meet the physical needs, while the spiritual, seemingly, was given sway that the world might be endowed with a riches of song and melody for which it was forever after to pay its tribute of gratitude to their creators.
One has but to read the biography of a great composer to see that his life was a living proof of the saying, "Music makes man love man," and agree with Liszt when he wrote of Chopin: "He was kind, noble and generous, Chopin, giving to his fellow man whatever he could spare of his earthly goods and leaving to the world no other inheritance than his music." Yet one endowed his name with as much love as the other has endowed his name with and endless fame.
It has been said that the great composers, with few exceptions, have left the world no other inheritance than their compositions, and yet many of them received princely sums for their latter works and fabulous gifts from crown heads, to say nothing of the generous provisions made for them from the the treasuries of the states in which they lived. Yet they died poor.
Perhaps Chopin's words to a lady admirer, in reply to her question as to whether he was wealthy: "My only wealth is in the richness of my musical notes," may shed some light upon the subject, if we interpret the remark to mean that most of the noted composers cared not for any other kind of riches than that in which they could endow their works. We know that Verdi gave away much of his earnings to the poor of his native city, and that Schubert was so good to others that he was frequently reminded of his too great consideration of the needs of the poor by his bankers returning to him his order upon the bank with the words "No funds to your credit" written across the face of the paper. Schubert's generosity was proverbial and once caused him to write to a friend: "I suppose you are right, my charity to others has made a mendicant of myself."
One of Mozart's highest aims in life was to live to see the day when he had dipensed in philanthropic works a hundred thousand florins, and we are told by one of his biographers that before the great maestro closed his eyes in death he had given away three times this sum to the poor of the country of this birth. Beethoven loved money, and was very exacting with his publishers in the payment of royalties due him, holding them to account for the last penny, and his earnings must, too, have been very great, for like Verdi he was the idol of the hour, yet he left to his heirs but little money.
He wrote to one of his pupils who asked him for some advice: "Love money, but only for the good you can do with it, and save every mark you can until you have accumulated enought money with which to do some substantial good." Mendelssohn dreamed of the good he could do with the money he received from the royalties upon his compositions, and it is said carried out many of his dreams. He, like other great composers, left to the world little inheritance besides his marvelous musical creations.
Donizetti died poor, yet he could have gone to his grave a weathly man for his time. Liszt gave away money, but never without seeing first wherein it would accomplish the greatest good, and when he was on his deathbed he turned to his spiritual comforter and said: "I have given away my silver and leave to the world as an inheritance but the works that have brought me the silver."
Gounod classed composers among dreamers. "They live in an atmosphere laden with music, to them the world is either a waltz or a dirge, gladness or sorrow," and Gottschalk wrote of his own life: "A dream, the air about which has been music, today the softness and sweetness of a nocturne, tomorrow possibly the power and majesty of a requiem." And the composer of the "Last Hope" was no exception to the rule, he died a poor man, leaving to the world much wealth, but like other great composers a wealth of sublime music. He is said to have earned a fortune and yet he left not enough money with which to raise a fitting monument over his grave. Great musicians, like poets, have nearly all been very visionary; "they have lived in the world and yet been no part of its material advancement," as Von Bulow put it, when writing of the lives of two of his fellow composers.
The world has been a beautiful dream in which they have produced the music with which to enchant the forms that have appeared in it. Money, worldly possessions have been but as the means to sustain the body while the mind dreamed and the fingers penned the sublime notes that inspirations brought forth from the heart.
Fame seems to have had no other meaning to the most of the world's greatest composers than as the wherewith, so to speak, with which they were to meet the physical needs, while the spiritual, seemingly, was given sway that the world might be endowed with a riches of song and melody for which it was forever after to pay its tribute of gratitude to their creators.
One has but to read the biography of a great composer to see that his life was a living proof of the saying, "Music makes man love man," and agree with Liszt when he wrote of Chopin: "He was kind, noble and generous, Chopin, giving to his fellow man whatever he could spare of his earthly goods and leaving to the world no other inheritance than his music." Yet one endowed his name with as much love as the other has endowed his name with and endless fame.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)